logo
Back to blog home

CSRD reporting in 2026: what has changed for UK and EU companies

From 2026, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) becomes a practical reality for many organisations with EU operations, including a significant number of UK‑based companies. This article explains what has changed, why workforce and payroll data now sit at the centre of CSRD, and how HR, finance and sustainability leaders can prepare for audit‑ready, data‑driven reporting.

June 24, 20265 min read
Sonya Gillam Image
by Sonya Gillam
CSRD reporting in 2026: what has changed for UK and EU companies

CSRD in 2026: from future requirement to operational reality

From 2026, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) moves from being a future obligation to an active reporting requirement for a wide range of organisations across the EU. Importantly, this shift also affects many UK‑based businesses.

While CSRD is often described as a sustainability regulation, in practice it represents a broader structural change. It reshapes how organisations manage, align and report workforce, payroll and ESG data at scale.

For many organisations, awareness is not the issue. The real challenge lies in the gap between understanding the regulation and having the systems, data and governance in place to meet its requirements in a consistent and auditable way.

Understanding CSRD in 2026: a move towards data‑driven reporting

CSRD significantly raises expectations for ESG reporting. What was previously a largely narrative exercise is becoming a data‑led, auditable discipline.

With the introduction of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), organisations are expected to deliver:

  • more granular disclosures
  • standardised and comparable data
  • reporting processes that can withstand audit scrutiny

This shift is particularly relevant for workforce‑related metrics, which form a core part of the social dimension of ESG reporting.

In many organisations, this data does not sit in a single system. As a result, the operational impact of CSRD is often felt most strongly in HR and payroll.

Why CSRD matters for UK organisations

There is still a perception that CSRD applies only to EU‑headquartered companies. In reality, many UK organisations are directly affected.

CSRD can apply if your organisation has:

  • EU operations or subsidiaries
  • EU‑listed entities
  • a significant revenue presence in the EU

This creates a level of complexity that many organisations have not previously faced. UK‑based groups may need to align:

  • UK‑specific ESG expectations
  • EU regulatory requirements under CSRD

The challenge is not simply interpreting multiple frameworks. It is ensuring that underlying workforce and financial data is consistent, reliable and aligned across regions and systems.

HR and payroll data are now central to ESG reporting

One of the most significant shifts under CSRD is the central role of HR and payroll data.

CSRD requires detailed, standardised disclosures covering areas such as:

  • Pay and remuneration structures
  • Workforce diversity and composition
  • Employee conditions, turnover and movement

In practice, this data is often:

  • distributed across multiple systems
  • Defined differently by function or geography
  • misaligned between HR and payroll

As CSRD reporting becomes auditable, these inconsistencies can no longer be managed informally. They become visible, measurable and subject to external assurance.

Integration is no longer optional

A consistent theme in CSRD readiness discussions is the growing importance of system integration.

CSRD is forcing organisations to examine how their HR, payroll and finance systems work together in reality, not just on paper.

In SAP‑based environments in particular, organisations often operate with:

  • SAP HCM or SuccessFactors alongside separate payroll solutions
  • Local variations in how payrollstructures and data definitions
  • Manual processes to produce group-level reporting

While these approaches may support day‑to‑day operations, they do not scale well for regulated, audit‑level ESG reporting.

What is increasingly required is:

  • a clear and standardised data model
  • alignment between HR and payroll data
  • greater automation where possible
  • defined governance, validation and ownership

Moving beyond compliance

It is understandable that CSRD is often approached primarily as a compliance exercise. Compliance is essential, but organisations that focus on it alone tend to struggle over time.

The broader value of CSRD lies in what reliable workforce data enables.

With integrated, consistent HR and payroll data, organisations can:

  • assess pay equity more accurately
  • identify structural workforce risks earlier
  • align HR strategy more closely with ESG objectives

In this context, CSRD becomes not just a reporting obligation, but a driver of better workforce decision‑making.

Where organisations are feeling the pressure

Across many organisations preparing for CSRD, similar challenges are emerging:

Data fragmentation

Workforce and payroll data often sit in silos, making consolidation complex and time-consuming.

Limited audit readiness

CSRD introduces assurance requirements that many organisations s are not yet equipped to meet.

Unclear ownership

Responsibility for ESG data frequently spans HR, finance and sustainability teams, with no single point of accountability.

Legacy system constraints

Older or on-premises systems can limit reporting flexibility and data standardisation.

None of these challenges are insurmountable,but they do require a more structured and proactive approach.

Building the right foundations early

For organisations that are earlier in their CSRD journey, there is actually a real advantage.

You have the opportunity to build your approach with the right foundations from the start:

  • Integrated HR and payroll systems
  • Clean, standardised data models
  • Scalable reporting frameworks

Rather than layering new requirements onto legacy processes, this is a chance to rethink how workforce and ESG data are managed more holistically.

Preparing for 2026: A Practical Focus

From a practical perspective, the organisations making the most progress are focusing on a few key areas:

  • Understanding where their current data sits
  • Mapping that data against CSRD requirements
  • Identifying gaps in quality and consistency
  • Improving alignment between HR, payroll, and finance systems
  • Strengthening governance and accountability

It’s not about solving everything at once—but about building a clear, structured path forward.

Final Thoughts: A Broader Shift in Accountability

For me, CSRD is part of a much wider trend.

We are moving towards a world where workforce data, pay transparency, and ESG reporting are increasingly interconnected.

HR and payroll are no longer purely operational functions—they are critical to how organisations demonstrate fairness, accountability, and trust.

CSRD simply makes that more visible.

Organisations that recognise this early—and invest in the right systems, data, and governance—will not only meet the requirements, but be in a much stronger position strategically.

Those that don’t risk turning reporting into a reactive, resource-heavy exercise.

Sonya Gillam Image

Sonya Gillam

Marketing Specialist, UK & Ireland

Sonya is a dedicated Marketing Specialist at Zalaris UK & Ireland. With extensive experience across various roles, from store management to Head Office operations, Sonya brings a wealth of knowledge in sales and marketing management to the team.